The most ambitious form
of treatment for AMN patients to date is the quantification of movement
impairments.
The purpose of this study is to
measure the time course of sensory loss and weakness and evaluate
treatments in people with AMN. This is being done through the development
of tests that are sensitive enough to detect defecits and track
small changes in sensation and strength over 6 months to a year.
Secondly, the further aim is to determine the relative contributions
of sensory loss and weakness to balance and walking. Previously,
doocumentation of AMN progression relied upon clinical observations
and subjective rating scales that required 4 to 5 years to show
change. This has made it difficult to evaluate small changes in
sensation and strength, and has delayed assessment of therapeutic
interventions.
In this study 15 men with AMN, and
four heterozygote carriers (women) were evaluated; a subset has
had repeat tests six months later. All patients were studies using
quantitative balance, walking, sensory, and strength tests. Standing
balance (sway) was measured using force plate recordings and 3-D
tracking of trunk and leg joint movements (Pototrak, Northern Digital).
Walking was assessed using a quantitative gait analysis (3-D tracking
of trunk and leg joints) and a Timed 25-Foot Walk test. Sensation
of the hands and feet was quantified using the Vibration II and
lower extremity strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer.
Our results show that all patients
were impaired on these tests relative to established control values;
we can easily distinguish mild to severe deficits across patients.
Sensation was severely impaired in the feet, not the hands, and
is correlated with deficits in balance. Multiple regression showed
that hip weakness is the most significant predictor of walking speed;
measures of sensation or balance were not strongly related. Analyses
of walking show that patients walk maintaining their knees and hips
in a flexed posture (active range of motion of the legs are decreased
compared to controls), and lean at the trunk to compensate for leg
weakness (trunk motion is increased compared to controls is increased
compared to controls). Preliminary data from the 6-month testing
session show significant changes in balance (sway scores doubled),
and smaller changes in sensation and strength measures.